How do you do a literature review

A good strategy is to begin by searching the homer catalog for books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also enter references manually into refworks if you need 4: analyze the you have identified and located the articles for your review, you need to analyze them and organize them before you begin writing:Overview the articles: skim the articles to get an idea of the general purpose and content of the article (focus your reading here on the abstract, introduction and first few paragraphs, the conclusion of each article.

What goes into a literature review

Your role as a reviewer is to evaluate what you read, so that your review is not a mere description of different articles, but rather a critical analysis that makes sense of the collection of articles that you are reviewing. The broad problem area, but avoid global in the review, indicate why the topic being reviewed is guish between research finding and other sources of te why certain studies are you are commenting on the timeliness of a topic, be specific in describing the time citing a classic or landmark study, identify it as a landmark study was replicated, mention that and indicate the results of the s other literature reviews on your the reader to other reviews on issues that you will not be discussing in y comments such as, "no studies were found.

What to include in a literature review

Conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. You can also do this using a word processor, or a concept mapping program like inspiration (free 30 trial download), a data base program (e.

How to write an academic literature review

However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Related items that provide additional information but that are not key to understanding the research problem can be included in a list of further short quotes are okay if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased.

In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevent sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;.

Some tips for identifying suitable literature and narrowing your search :Start with a general descriptor from the database thesaurus or one that you know is already a well defined descriptor based on past work that you have done in this field. It focuses on a specific topic of interest to you and includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work.

It is a good idea, as part of your literature search, to look for existing literature reviews that have already been written on this part of your search, be sure to identify landmark or classic studies and theorists as these provide you with a framework/context for your your references into your refworks account (see: refworks import directions for guide on how to do this from different databases). Those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis.

State university of west georgia, distance education the index of how to video is queuequeuewatch next video is to write a literature review in 30 minutes or cribe from david taylor? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?

Your analysis can make generalizations across a majority of studies, but should also note inconsistencies across studies and over fy gaps in the literature, and reflect on why these might exist (based on the understandings that you have gained by reading literature in this field of study). Important: if you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite the page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review (as direct quotes must always be accompanied by page references).

Reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. You may find the program inspiration useful in mapping out your argument (and once you have created this in a concept map form, inspiration enables you to convert this to a text outline merely by clicking on the "outline" button).

In to add this to watch ture review: conducting & literature ture review: conducting & guide will provide research and writing tips to help students complete a literature review for conducting a lit g "the literature". Works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of critical evaluation of each work should consider:Provenance -- what are the author's credentials?

This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. I have integrated some other tips within this guide, particularly in suggesting different technology tools that you might want to consider in helping you organize your review.

The advantage of using excel is that it enables you to sort your findings according to a variety of factors (e. A topic outline that traces your argument: first explain to the reader your line or argument (or thesis); then your narrative that follows should explain and justify your line of argument.

A form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication.

Galvan outlines a very clear, step-by-step approach that is very useful to use as you write your review. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems.