Review of related literature in research
Literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. You can also do this using a word processor, or a concept mapping program like inspiration (free 30 trial download), a data base program (e. Good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program.
What is review of related literature
Typically a review will cover the last five years, but should also refer to any landmark studies prior to this time if they have significance in shaping the direction of the field. Note: although you may collect a large number of quotes during the note taking phase of your review, when you write the review, use quotes very sparingly. Analysis of the literature allows the scholar to develop frameworks for analysis and the ability to see the big picture and know how details from the literature fit within the big picture.
The review of related literature
Page was last edited on 11 october 2017, at 19: is available under the creative commons attribution-sharealike license;. Ways to organize your literature your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. Literature review is more than the search for information, and goes beyond being a descriptive annotated bibliography.
Thinking about your literature structure of a literature review should include the following:An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,Division of works under review into themes or categories [e. It focuses on a specific topic of interest to you and includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work. For a person doing a literature review this would include tasks such as recognition, retrieval and recollection of the relevant literature.
It may be a little extra work for them, but there will be even more work if they have to tear apart a review because it is built on shaky ting a good literature review takes patience and is a matter of practice. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. In writing the literature review, our purpose is to our reader what knowledge and been established on a topic, and what ths and weaknesses are.
This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the , anthea. The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge the importance for themselves.
Most often associated with academic-oriented literature, such reviews are found in academic journals, and are not to be confused with book reviews that may also appear in the same publication. You begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research , chris. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are sections of your literature you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy.
All sides of an argument must be clearly explained, to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted. Isbn ries: academic publishinghidden categories: articles to be merged from june 2017all articles to be mergedarticles needing expert attention with no reason or talk parameterarticles needing unspecified expert attentionarticles needing expert attention from may 2014all articles needing expert attentionall articles lacking reliable referencesarticles lacking reliable references from february 2016articles lacking in-text citations from november 2010all articles lacking in-text logged intalkcontributionscreate accountlog pagecontentsfeatured contentcurrent eventsrandom articledonate to wikipediawikipedia out wikipediacommunity portalrecent changescontact links hererelated changesupload filespecial pagespermanent linkpage informationwikidata itemcite this a bookdownload as pdfprintable version. However, before you begin writing, you must evaluate your reference list to ensure that it is up to date and has reported the most current work.
The advantage of using excel is that it enables you to sort your findings according to a variety of factors (e. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the ic [“conceptual categories”]. If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research the web of science [a.
Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make your job easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. It is a good idea, as part of your literature search, to look for existing literature reviews that have already been written on this part of your search, be sure to identify landmark or classic studies and theorists as these provide you with a framework/context for your your references into your refworks account (see: refworks import directions for guide on how to do this from different databases). Galvan outlines a very clear, step-by-step approach that is very useful to use as you write your review.