Results and discussion in research paper
Each hypotheses or research question in more not repeat what you have already said in your results—instead, focus on adding new information and broadening the perspective of your results to you s how your results compare to previous findings in the literature. 1985;11(1):27–es from journal of the medical library association : jmla are provided here courtesy of medical library s:article | pubreader | epub (beta) | pdf (150k) | e to the purdue ch and citation •. Neither the rate at which the use of this format increased nor the point at which it became the standard for today's medical scientific writing is well established.
This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your . The procedure should include:A description of the experimental design and how participants were assigned fication of your independent variable(s) (iv), dependent variable(s) (dv), and control variables. With offices in the us, india, japan, china, south korea, and singapore, editage is a trusted global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions.
However, the act of articulating the results helps you to understand the problem from within, to break it into pieces, and to view the research problem from various page length of this section is set by the amount and types of data to be reported. It is not uncommon to have unanticipated results that are not relevant to answering the research question, and this is not to say that you don't acknowledge tangential findings, but spending time describing them only clutters your overall results section. However, speculating as to why this correlation exists, and offering a hypothesis about what may be happening, belongs in the discussion section of your t a result and then explain it, before presenting the next result then explaining it, and so on, then end with an overall synopsis.
The accepted term for describing a person who participates in research studies is a participant not a . Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion ion: a claim for how the results can be applied more generally. It is rarely clear-cut, and you will need to interpret your example, one of your graphs may show a distinct trend, but not enough to reach an acceptable significance er that no significance is not the same as no difference, and you can begin to explain this in your discussion your results may not be enough to reject the null hypothesis, they may show a trend that later researchers may wish to explore, perhaps by refining the -criticism at the heart of writing a discussion section for this purpose, you should criticize the experiment, and be honest about whether your design was good enough.
It is the same as shown in figure 1, and the descending curves represent all other forms of text organization. Think of the results section as the place where you report what your study found; think of the discussion section as the place where you interpret your data and answer the "so what? However, you do need to evaluate your own results against others’ findings, especially if they are different.
The journals had to be currently published at the beginning of the 20th century and show no interruptions during the studied criteria used by the journal for an original article were accepted. S not unusual to find articles in social science journals where the author(s) have combined a description of the findings with a discussion about their implications. 2004 october; 92(4): article has been cited by other articles in ctbackground: the scientific article in the health sciences evolved from the letter form and purely descriptive style in the seventeenth century to a very standardized structure in the twentieth century known as introduction, methods, results, and discussion (imrad).
In the 1970s, it reached 80% and, in the 1980s, was the only pattern adopted in original sions: although recommended since the beginning of the twentieth century, the imrad structure was adopted as a majority only in the 1970s. However, focus only on findings that are important and related to addressing the research problem. You should write a direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results, usually in one .
Highlight the most important findings you want readers to remember as they transition into the discussion section. Make suggestions for further may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper]. In this model, it is helpful to provide a brief conclusion that ties each of the findings together and provides a narrative bridge to the discussion section of the your : just as the literature review should be arranged under conceptual categories rather than systematically describing each source, organize your findings under key themes related to addressing the research problem.
A few historical references may be helpful for perspective but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results or used to link to similar studies. If not, suggest any modifications and improvements that could be made to the the reason that you did not find a significant correlation is because your sampling was not random, or you did not use sensitive enough discussion section is not always about what you found, but what you did not find, and how you deal with that. A section describing results is particularly necessary if your paper includes data generated from your own ey, thomas m.
When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. An example would be: “in the case of determining available housing to single women with children in rural areas of texas, the findings suggest that access to good schools is important," then move on to explaining this endations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections. Please see our writing with statistics handout for more information on how to write with discussion section is where you talk about what your results mean and where you wrap up the overall story you are telling.
