Research proposal medicine
In analyzing data for three recent review sessions (june 1996, october 1996, and february 1997) from the surgery, anesthesiology, and trauma study section, 26% of anesthesiology applications scored in the top 20th percentile, and 31% scored in the top 25th percentile; clearly no bias exists against anesthesiology in this predominantly surgical study section, at least in this limited sample (alison cole, anesthesiology representative for the national institute of general medicine science at the nih, personal communication, december, 1997). These include the report of the committee on rating grant applications[double vertical bar] and review criteria for rating unsolicited research grants.
Training in clinical anesthesia is not training in research methodology or scientific thinking; it does not prepare an individual for a career in investigation. Institutional resources include related departmental and interdepartmental seminar series, a critical mass of investigators in a related area, instrument development and repair shops, and necessary laboratory space and common research ia for a sound research proposal are the same whether the proposal is submitted to nih, faer, iars, or other funding sources.
To ensure that the nonexpert is convinced of the validity and importance of proposed methodologies, the overall proposal should be written with a logical flow of ideas that build from basic to sophisticated concepts. Because of the diversity of research projects in anesthesiology, these grants were awarded by 14 different institutes, centers, and divisions within the nih.
One thing that helps a research proposal succeed is its originality from prior research and existing projects. Because of the changing climate of clinical medicine, researchers (both clinical and basic science) face increasing pressure to minimize research time.
Research proposals must document institutional support for nonclinical time, and the investigator must provide evidence that this time has been used wisely and will continue to be dedicated to the proposed research proposal must document a track record of productivity by the investigator. Objectives should be simple (not complex), specific (not vague), and stated in advance (not after the research is done).
They create a setting for the ic objectives are statements of the research question(s). Also keep an eye out for good transitional elements to make your research proposal flow te your rough draft.
Criteria for this include a track record of publication in the area of the proposed research, continued peer-reviewed funding, and a history of successfully training young investigators. In order to be fairly successful, your medical research proposal should be coherent, and the ideas that are presented should be presented clearly and consistently throughout each your plan for originality.
Two important anesthesia-specific organizations exist to support anesthesia research - the foundation for anesthesia education and research (faer, an organization under the auspices of the american society of anesthesiologists) and the international anesthesiology research society (iars). Common errors in conducting research include lack of confirmation of drug concentrations, inadequate reproducibility of final results, lack of standardization of procedures, inadequate follow-up, incomplete data recording, and overall lack of uate or inappropriate statistical methods can be a major weakness of a grant proposal.
Although obvious for basic science research, clinical research also requires commitment of a minimum of 1 yr of dedicated training with a good mentor, and more typically 2 - 3 yr in the field of the proposed research. Bethesda, office of reports and analysis (component of the office of extramural research), national institutes of health.
The most crucial aspect of the background is to build a case for significance of the proposed research regarding the ultimate clinical application or mechanistic understanding. Reviewers tend to be impressed when the investigator presents potential problems that never occurred to them, because it suggests that the investigator is an expert in this area of research.
Common statistical errors in research proposals include lack of sample size/power calculations, treating continuous variables as dichotomous, repeated t tests when a more comprehensive modeling approach should be taken, application of statistical tests that assume normality without verifying assumptions, failure to consider covariate effects, and failure to distinguish between interindividual and intraindividual variability. Young investigator annoucements (from faer) and several new iars awards require several years as a successful junior faculty member, so expectations of demonstrated research success are further increased.
In this era of diminishing revenues, the ability to compete successfully for peer-reviewed research money is essential to create and maintain scientific programs. Randomized controlled trial comparing ginkgo biloba versus acetazolamide, acetazolamide plus ginkgo, and placebo for the prevention of acute mountain al research – an institutional resource for various programs supporting patient research at penn state college of medicine and penn state health milton s.
When submitting a revised application, an introduction (placed before the specific aims section) is used to discuss how criticisms of the original grant have been addressed in the revised proposal. Unique to faer and iars research committees is that the reviewers are mostly investigators and practicing anesthesiologists.
Degrees have applied for national institutes of health (nih) grants compared with researchers with m. For fiscal year 1996, the nih awarded 149 research grants (including career development grants, r29, r01, and program project grants) to departments of anesthesiology, totaling $21 million in direct costs ([almost equal to]$31 million in total costs).
Although descriptive clinical studies are interesting to practicing clinicians, from a scientific perspective, clinical research must be driven by testable hypotheses. The litmus test for clinical significance is whether the proposed research will improve patient care.