Research literature review

What types of sources should i review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required.

What is literature review in research

A literature review is not simply a chronological catalog of all your sources, but an evaluation. Google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is.

The literature review in research

Good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem.

Were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Literature reviews are also common in a research proposal or prospectus (the document that is approved before a student formally begins a dissertation or thesis).

And rangarajan (2013) distinguish between the process of reviewing the literature and a finished work or product known as a literature review. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies.

A meta-analysis is typically a systematic review using statistical methods to effectively combine the data used on all selected studies to produce a more reliable result. Article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations.

If their name keeps cropping up, and they have written many papers, the source is probably ok. They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, this is best example, a review of victorian age physics may certainly present j.

A smaller number of quality sources is far preferable than a long but irrelevant list. What other sections you include in the body is up to you but include only what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship are examples of other sections you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:Current situation: information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature y: the chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a ion methods: the criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review.

For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of german economic power after the fall of the soviet your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. Those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis.

Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point? It’s usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with the name of a researcher.

Take solace that even the best scientists can fall into the trap of using poor evidence. Ways to organize your literature your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published.

For example, a book surveying the history of the israeli-palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where egypt is mentioned in the er whether your sources are disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of s enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in two ation seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles and al appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid studies.

Reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. Web of knowledge] citation database and google scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review.

This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made.

Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. Yourself questions like these about each book or article you include:Has the author formulated a problem/issue?