Nsf eager proposal
With this approach, a panel provides an assessment of potentially transformative research of the proposals. For example, in the multi-day program manager seminar for all new program officers, there are sessions on approaches to promote and identify potentially transformative research.
But they do share one feature that makes them appropriate for nsf’s special funding mechanism: each represented a tabula rasa for curious researchers. Based on this input, efri prioritizes the topics and calls for proposals in the selected areas through its program factory sandpit.
Eager awards should be reserved for situations, he says, in which “a pi [principal investigator] has a brilliant new way to tackle a problem, but lacks the resources to collect the preliminary data needed to show that it’s possible. Program officers are often faced with making very difficult judgments about a proposal,” he says.
If the ofr and the nsf determine that a research idea falls within the program scope, the principal investigator will be invited to submit a formal proposal. Nsf program officers are requested to identify potentially transformative research proposals for funding in all programs.
The purpose of eager is to encourage high-risk research at the frontier, and there may be more opportunities to do that in some disciplines than in others. They also feature a quicker turnaround time, as program officers don’t have to convene an outside panel and wait for its judgment on the value and soundness of the research proposal.
Principal investigators (pis) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic prior to submission of an eager proposal to determine the appropriateness of the work for consideration under the eager mechanism. We don’t really know what it is, but we can recognize it when we see it,” one veteran staffer -director arden bement launched eager in 2009 as one of two programs that would rely on in-house reviews.
Nsf program officers are also expected to provide guidance to panelists and ad hoc reviewers to identify potentially transformative research proposals in their addition to encouraging the submission of proposals for transformative research through all nsf programs, nsf supports specific investment areas, special mechanisms, and new methodologies of identifying and funding potentially transformative encourages potentially transformative research proposals in specific investment annual nsf budget to congress identifies investment areas that are notable for being interdisciplinary, supported by numerous nsf directorates, and intended to have transformative impact across science and engineering fields. In fact, in the fy2010 nsf budget request, each research division is provided funds explicitly to explore methodologies that help support transformative examples below illustrate some of the efforts being piloted across the foundation:Focus on identifying potentially transformative research.
Special creativity extensions are generally initiated by the nsf program officer based on progress during the first two years of a three-year grant; pis will be informed of such action a year in advance of the expiration of the lishment-based accomplishment based renewal is a special type of renewal proposal appropriate only for an investigator who has made significant contributions, over a number of years, in the area of research addressed by the proposal. The principal investigator will be informed if an external review is -cost extensions and requests for supplemental funding will be processed in accordance with standard nsf policies and to submit formal proposals - electronic als must be submitted to nsf electronically via or .
Of diversity and arency and ormative review ormative to submit potentially transformative research nsf programs encourage and support potentially transformative research programs are announced through program announcements or solicitations, and are managed by one or more nsf divisions. Your knowledge of the process and the sort of projects that get funded are crucial to developing a successful you take your project down the eager pathway?
Through discussions and training, nsf program officers and reviewers have an increased focus on identifying potentially transformative research. Some nsf programs go even further, requiring a brief description of the proposed research and then weeding out those ideas deemed not a good doesn’t keep any statistics on that give-and-take, however, so it’s impossible to know what proportion of initial eager pitches are ultimately successful.
Because nsf’s current merit review system is so highly regarded, program officers are inherently skeptical of anything that takes the broader scientific community out of the equation, notes jeryl mumpower, division director for the social and economic sciences. Scientists thinking about submitting an eager proposal are required to talk first to a program officer, for starters.
For proposals prepared and submitted via , the guidelines specified in the nsf application guide will proposers who cannot submit electronically, an authorization to deviate from the electronic submission requirements must be approved in advance of submission of the paper colleague are now leaving the ofr’s will be redirected to:Please note that ofr does not own or endorse this website, and by visiting it you are subject to the destination site’s privacy and other policies when you follow the link. The relative scarcity of eager awards within the directorate—51 proposals, of which 49 were funded—reflect that narrow definition, he , who left nsf in 2010 and returned to purdue university in west lafayette, indiana, where he is now director emeritus of its global policy research institute, agrees that such views are widespread among nsf staffers.
Instead, a group of nsf staffers vets the application and moves it up the chain of e reviewers would have been superfluous on his eager proposal, telang believes. In to add this to watch search term(s):A principal investigator interested in the program should submit a brief white paper (no more than two pages) outlining the research plan by e-mail to nsfofr@.
Rick wash of msu on nsf grants - pt g and funding the best science: peer review at research - finding the best grants to study for a of research & research designs -- rey g more suggestions... In to add this to watch video is queuequeuewatch next video is -demand webinar: early-concept grants for exploratory research (eager) at cribe from piawebinars?
The eager mechanism should not be used for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" (i. In recent years, the program has had an even higher batting average—95% in 2011 and 91% in e those overwhelmingly favorable odds, the 5-year-old program doles out only one-fifth of what some senior nsf officials think the foundation should be spending on eager grants.